Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 7:02:44 GMT
The final argument is based on the idea that taxing the rich would end up hurting the poor. The most recent developments in the theory and practice of the relationship between taxation and distribution such as those of tienne Fize Camille Landais and Nicolas Grimprel and Thomas Piketty Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman support these arguments. On the contrary they technically ethically and politically justify the need for a tax system that is based on three progressive and comprehensive taxes on personal sources of income personal wealth inheritances legacies and donations inter vivos. in Argentina has a first problem of marginal rates that favor those who earn the most.
But in addition it charges different rates depending on the source of income. This allows for example Russia Mobile Number List who receive income from salaries and capital to choose from which source they declare their income given that it is very difficult to audit income and consumption flows when their levels are very high. Most capital income is due to increases in asset values and much income is reported as held by the corporations that the wealthiest people own. This would be resolved with a progressive and comprehensive tax on all income without exceptions or special treatments with adequate minimum exemptions that favor the lowestincome people and with progressive rates. This tax should be complemented with a progressive wealth tax that is also unified for each person
There are multiple works that record that inequality in the distribution of wealth is greater than inequality in the distribution of income. Tendencies to concentrate resources on the super rich are documented and pointed out as a threat to the functioning of democracies. Furthermore there is evidence to doubt the legality of the way in which many of the great fortunes are obtained and increased as demonstrated by the funds hidden in tax havens. For the same previous arguments the wealth tax should be progressive and comprehensive in all its forms to avoid manipulation according to the type of asset and liability.